Abstract submission guidelines

Abstract submission for the conference will commence on March 15th and close on August 1st.

Please prepare your abstract according to the provided template and submit it using our online submission system. Please note that we will not accept abstracts submitted via email. If you encounter any issues, contact us at conference@kias.org.np. Upon submission, you will receive an acknowledgment email. All abstracts will undergo peer review, and revisions may be requested for clarity, style, and language. Accepted abstracts will be notified to authors and published on the conference website and abstract book.

Submission guidelines

The abstract must be prepared and submitted in English.

1. Presenting author responsibilities: If you are submitting an abstract, we assume you are the presenting author and therefore are responsible for the following:
  • Submitting your own work.

  • Assuring all co-authors have reviewed and approved the abstract’s content.

  • Registering for the conference.

  • Presenting the abstract at the conference, if accepted.

2. Be ready with following before submission.
  • Title: Title of abstract should be concise, clearly convey the content of abstract. It may contain up to 85 characters, including spaces.

  • Author(s): Name of all authors who have really contributed the work. Indicate the presenting author.

  • Author affiliation: Primary affiliation for each coauthor including address.

  • Abstract body: The abstract should be less than 250 words and should provide a clear description of research objectives, the main results and conclusion.

  • Graphical abstract (optional): We encourage you to submit a graphical abstract.

  • Category: Choose from the key submission tracks listed above.

  • Keywords: At least three keywords are required; up to 5 are allowed. Keywords represent the content of your paper.

3. Reasons for abstract rejection.
  • Subject matter is not appropriate for MoChWo.

  • Information is not new enough.

  • Abstract is duplicate of other submissions.

  • Format does not follow guidelines.

  • Submission is poorly written.